The hardest part of research is starting. The hardest part of a PhD program, in my humble opinion, is crafting the dissertation proposal. It means coming up with an original project–which is no easy feat as much good work precedes us. It means coming up with something feasible. Oh, and many good questions go unanswered because they are impossible: “hey, could you guys start a war under these conditions, so we can see what happens?”
I have been teaching a seminar that aims at getting the students through the proposal. This is tricky enough, but is even more complicated by a few key realities at my school:
- The students are a mix of economists and political scientists, so they have very different research topics with all of the economists and most of the political scientists working on issues and using methodologies that are outside my expertise and often way outside.
- As an interdisciplinary program, we don’t always have clear understanding of what is to be expected–how much theory? How much methods? How specific? How long should the proposal be?
- The aim is for these folks to work in non-academic settings, but we have no idea what that market is really demanding and most of the profs (nearly all of us) were trained by traditional disciplines aimed at producing professors.
The way I teach this class is workshop the dissertation proposals piece by piece: the question, the possible answers (the dreaded lit review), the theory, the testable hypotheses, the methods. Scattered along the way, due to various opportunities, we spend time on grant proposals, research ethics, and other stuff. Each student gives a practice dissertation proposal presentation somewhere along the way.
The fun but challenging part is to try to give feedback on projects that are, as I said, all over place and beyond my expertise for the most part. The good news is I have fresh eyes. The bad news is that I have no idea if they are asking original questions (I don’t know the literatures they are reviewing) or if their methods make sense (if they are working on something fairly technical). Today was the last course meeting, and I realized I have had fun getting inside their projects, providing feedback where I can. I was able, I think, to provide some useful advice (take it or leave it, no biggie) even to those working on the stuff that is beyond me, and I had fun with some of the ideas that I could plausibly research myself. The students have made much progress, although their advisers may be horrified by my suggestions. Ooops.
Anyhow, as much as we complain about reading multiple drafts of stuff and how work in progress is often very slooooowly in progress, in my conversations during and after class, I was reminded that it is fun to work with folks as they are starting out. The work is really hard, but the creativity is inspiring, and working with them to figure out how to surmount the obstacles can be fun. I got in this job in part to play with ideas, and I use the word “play” deliberately. As this is fun stuff, and I am glad to be reminded of that basic reality, which is often lost in the daily grind.
So, thanks to my INAF 6900 seminar for reminding me.